The road to BLISS
I just watched Nick Cage’s latest film: KNOWING. The film opens with some interesting dialogue between a college
professor (Cage) and his students. Without giving anything away from the movie, he ponders the randomness and
the order within the universe; coincidence or design. So the story begins.
In a world where scientists seek to have preeminence, they nurture order in the universe in one hand, while
forcing randomnesswith the other. In what other discussions on earth can such a dichotomy occur
unchallenged? Can such exquisite order, harmony and replication occur from coincidence? Scientific rigor is
founded in replication. It is the criteria on which truth is established. How many times did this event repeat
itself?
Question: For how many centuries have women given birth to humankind? In what generation did the male of the
species produce the offspring? When did the process change by which human life is created?
And, how about water: Has man ever made a drop? Don’t keep fooling yourselves people; that liquid you buy in
those plastic bottles is not water-it is merely a water-like beverage, produced in a laboratory.
(Remember, you’ve allowed the real water to be destroyed and have convinced yourselves that this enhanced liquid is better for you. Riiiight!)
Water continues to be that liquid that falls out of wherever, down to earth, on which our life is sustained, and
from which (some believe) we were created. Others say from the ooze we evolved??? Then let us drink ooze.
Scientists, GOD BLESS ‘EM, have been played (to use a street term). They know that if they were to have open,
non-restricted, discussion they would see things differently. Why is the mere acknowledgement of another
possible causation of life, fighting words; a reason to be expelled from school, from your job, from your
academic community?
Now take a few moments to watch THE FOUR HORSEMEN; the film interview of Mr. Dawkins and his atheist crew
of experts.Listen and learn as they tell you why they believe what they believe. (I wonder if they could have
conducted that interview without the assorted liquid spirits around the table.) They profess to be scientists. Nick
Cage merely plays a scientist who trusts in the facts and when the facts contradict his opinion, he… Anyway, Nick
Cage’s movie is (in my opinion) more entertaining and it encourages you to think for yourself.
Oh I forgot, thinking, like intelligence, is not allowed.

Loading...